bramblepatch:the linguistic shift from “avatar” or “icon” to “pfp” is bad actually. bring back the implications of ritual significance. cowards.

bramblepatch:the linguistic shift from “avatar” or “icon”

bramblepatch:the linguistic shift from “avatar” or “icon”

bramblepatch:the linguistic shift from “avatar” or “icon”

bramblepatch:the linguistic shift from “avatar” or “icon”

bramblepatch:the linguistic shift from “avatar” or “icon”

bramblepatch:the linguistic shift from “avatar” or “icon”

bramblepatch:the linguistic shift from “avatar” or “icon”

bramblepatch:the linguistic shift from “avatar” or “icon”

bramblepatch:the linguistic shift from “avatar” or “icon”

bramblepatch:the linguistic shift from “avatar” or “icon”

bramblepatch:the linguistic shift from “avatar” or “icon”

bramblepatch:the linguistic shift from “avatar” or “icon”

bramblepatch:the linguistic shift from “avatar” or “icon”

bramblepatch:the linguistic shift from “avatar” or “icon”

bramblepatch:the linguistic shift from “avatar” or “icon”

bramblepatch:the linguistic shift from “avatar” or “icon”

bramblepatch:the linguistic shift from “avatar” or “icon”

bramblepatch:the linguistic shift from “avatar” or “icon”

bramblepatch:the linguistic shift from “avatar” or “icon”

[girlsinhoodies ] [girlsinhoods ]

bramblepatch:the linguistic shift from “avatar” or “icon” to “pfp” is bad actually. bring back the implications of ritual significance. cowards.

more from 0nigum0